WebErgative-absolutive languages, sometimes called ergative languages, are languages where the subject of an intransitive verb and the object of a transitive verb behave the same way in a sentence. Both behave differently to the subject of a transitive verb. In English and other nominative languages, the agent ("doer", she in She walked the dog ...

WebIn an ergative–absolutive system, S and O are one group and contrast with A. The English language represents a typical nominative–accusative system (accusative for short). The name derived from the nominative and accusative cases. Basque is an ergative–absolutive system (or simply ergative). The name stemmed from the ergative and ...

WebIn linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent of a transitive verb. Examples are Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, certain Indo-European languages (such as the …

WebIn linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent of a transitive verb.

WebMany languages have ergative–absolutive alignment only in some parts of their grammar (e.g., in the case marking of nouns), but nominative-accusative alignment in other parts (e.g., in the case marking of pronouns, or in person agreement). This …

WebIn linguistic typology, nominative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument of an intransitive verb shares some coding properties with the agent argument of a transitive verb and other coding properties with the patient argument ('direct object') of a transitive verb. It is typically observed in a subset of the …

WebOct 03, 2018 · This is in contrast with ergative–absolutive alignment, where S is coded in the same way as O, while A receives distinct marking, or tripartite alignment, where A, S and O all are coded in a different manner.. Split ergativity [edit]. It is common for languages (such as Georgian and Hindustani) to have overlapping alignment systems, which …

WebIn linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent of a transitive verb.[1] Examples are Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, certain Indo-European languages . It has controversially also …

WebIn linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent of a transitive verb.[1] Examples are Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, a few Indo-European languages (such as the Kurdish …

WebIn linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent of a transitive verb. Examples are Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, certain Indo-European languages (such as the …

WebThe Ergative alignment, formally known as Absolutive-Ergative alignment, is a rather common grammatical case system. Absolutive-Ergative differentiates between the Agent, it being marked in the Ergative case, from the Subject, with the fusion of both seen in Nominative-Accusative systems. The Absolutive case marks the Object and Subject the …

WebOct 28, 2006 · Ergative alignment.svg. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. File. File history. File usage on Commons. File usage on other wikis. Size of this PNG preview of this SVG file: 300 × 250 pixels. Other resolutions: 288 × 240 pixels | 576 × 480 pixels | 922 × 768 pixels | 1,229 × 1,024 pixels | 2,458 × 2,048 pixels.

WebA number of languages have both ergative and accusative morphology. A typical example is a language that has nominative–accusative marking on verbs and ergative–absolutive case marking on nouns. Georgian also has an ergative alignment, but the agent is only marked with the ergative case in the perfective aspect (also known as the "aorist ...

Web作通型配列（ Ergative–absolutive alignment ），也称为作通格配列、施通格配列、作格配列、施格配列或能格配列，是一類配列方式，即在句法或形态上，将不及物动词的单一变元和及物动词的受事 论元同等对待（S=P），而区别对待及物动词的施事论元（A）:110 。 作通型配列可以在形态（编码性质）和 ...