Under segregation, Black and White people were to be separated, purportedly to minimize violence. De jure segregation, or “Jim Crow,” lasted from the 1880s to 1964. Jim Crow laws …

The difference between de facto and de jure segregation is that de facto segregation is by personal choice or private practices, while de jure is due to discriminatory government policy. …

The difference between de facto and de jure segregation is that de facto segregation is by personal choice or private practices, while de jure is due to discriminatory government policy. …

De facto (i.e. by fact) segregation is the practice of racial discrimination which is not mandated by the government. In contrast, de jure (i.e. by law) segregation is racial segregation enforced …

Judicial rulings and legislation passed during the era of the Civil Rights Movement ended de jure segregation, separation that was mandated by law and enforced by the government. But de …

Abstract. In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 declared unconstitutional voluntary, race-based plans to integrate public …

Today, the difference between de jure and de facto segregation is most obvious in public schools. Though intentional de jure racial segregation of schools was banned by the Civil Rights Act of …

De facto segregation is the separation of groups that happens even though it is not required or sanctioned by law. Rather than an intentionally legislated effort to separate the groups, de …

Legal separation of people groups enforced by law. example of de jure segregation. Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in all public schools, …

Terms in this set (9) De Jure Segregation. Racial segregation that occurs because of laws or administrative decisions by public agencies. De Facto Segregation. Racial segregation that …